Borderline Personality Disorder

http://www.viewborderline personality disordrline-personality-disorder/
Current research indicates that personality disorders affect about 12% of the general population and constitute a significant mental health issue (Zanarini, 2005a). Recent studies have found that personality disorders (PDs) are more powerful predictors of quality of life than any one of the following: (1) socio-demographic variables; (2) Axis I disorders; and/or (3) somatic health (Zanarini, 2005a). It is also well known that patients with personality disorders make extensive use of mental health facilities and have more extensive histories of inpatient and outpatient treatment when compared to patients presenting only with Axis I disorders such as major depression (Zanarini, 2005a). All of the above highlight the importance of considering personality disorders in treatment planning and management of patients with dual diagnosis (Zanarini, 2005a).


Although it is generally recognized that personality disorders have a poorer response to treatment across all treatment modalities, there are a number of emerging findings that suggest more optimistic outcomes to treatment and management (Zanarini, 2005a). Most notably, emerging patterns indicate that personality disorders are not as stable as initially thought and studies indicate that they tend to go into remission at a quicker pace than expected (Zanarini, et al., 2007). It also appears that certain aspects of personality disorder are more amenable to treatment (Zanarini, et al., 2007). Further, there is now more evidence to suggest that borderline personality disorder (BPD) responds relatively well to treatment (Zanarini, et al., 2007).


Although borderline patients are very difficult to work with and pose many dilemmas for the treatment process, evidence suggests that they have a reasonably good prognosis when compared to other PDs and anxiety disorders (Zanarini, et al., 2005).

Continue reading

Killing Them with Love

One of the most difficult things about working with addicts can be working with the families.  The families are scared to death that the next phone call will be the police, or God forbid, the morgue.  I know that I put my family through hell.  However, the best thing that loved ones can do for the addict in their life is to let them go with love when they relapse.  Trying to “save” the addict doesn’t work.  I always counsel families to support health and recovery, not sickness.

I recently worked with a family who keeps trying to “save” their child.  Unfortunately, the message that they send the addict is counterproductive as well as counter-intuitive.  The client was doing fairly well although struggling behaviorly, and we were trying to work with that client to become less entitled and more humble and willing, without much success.  The client got a job finally which was great.  Unfortunately, that client no longer felt that the rules applied to him/her and when we tried to enforce the rules, that client decided to leave treatment.

However, that client didn’t have a plan for living or many life skills and returned to addiction.  The client proceeded to also lose the job.  However, instead of cutting the client off, the family ran to the rescue.  This was the rescue plan…they took the client on a vacation, let the client go to inappropriate and dangerous venues and then kept the client in a hotel room instead of putting the client immediately back in a sober living environment as a requirement for getting back into the treatment facility.  The client didn’t like the sober living options and wanted to do it the client’s way.

Unfortunately again, the client had the family too terrified to say no or to make rational decisions.  Guess what, that client relapsed again and got his/her way…the client got to go back to another treatment center that wasn’t requiring behavioral change (yet), and now doesn’t have to work or take responsibility for life.

So what is the message here?  If I use drugs then I get vacations, hotels and go back to a cushy treatment environment.  But if I get sober then I actually have to take responsibility for my life and I have to work and pay my own way.  How’s that client going to learn about consequences and living life on life’s terms that way?  I know that the family meant well but rescuing that client will end up being that client’s demise.

Dual Diagnosis Article -Published in InRecovery Magazine

Dual Diagnosis

by Amy Novicoff-Fackrell

After approximately 20 years of development and research, dual diagnosis services for clients with severe mental illness are emerging as an evidence-based practice. Effective dual diagnosis programs combine mental health and substance abuse interventions that are tailored for the complex needs of clients with co-morbid disorders. This article seeks to describe the critical components of effective programs, which include a comprehensive, long-term, staged approach to recovery, assertive outreach, motivational interventions, provision of help to clients in acquiring skills and supports to manage both illnesses and to pursue functional goals, and cultural sensitivity and competence. While there have been some state implementation dual diagnosis services within the mental health system, funding has been markedly decreased and high-quality services are rare. This article also seeks to provide a current, comprehensive approach to implementing a dual diagnosis program that incorporates clarity of program mission with structural approaches designed to support dual diagnosis services, training and supervision of clients, and to disseminate accurate information to consumers and families to support understanding.


Although treatment centers and programs traditionally have focused on drug addiction within the framework of 12-Step philosophies and treated the associated conditions that perpetuate addiction as secondary, it is more effective to address chemical dependency, substance use, and the “associated conditions” equally and simultaneously. The goal of dual diagnosis interventions is recovery from two or more serious illnesses. “Recovery” means that the individual with a dual diagnosis learns to manage both illnesses so that he or she can pursue meaningful life goals.


A client-centered approach to working with people “where they are” rather than “where they should be,” as dictated by many treatment providers and therapists who specialize in dual disorders is more effective. Clients should be encouraged to set their own goals while staff continues to provide support and assistance as these goals change over time.


What is Dual Diagnosis?

“Dual diagnosis” is defined as having a severe mental illness associated with dependence on alcohol, or other substances. Epidemiologic studies have shown that between 25% and 50% of people with one mental disorder have at least one co-occurring mental disorder. There are two subgroups of patients: major substance abuse disorder coupled with another major psychiatric disorder; and abuse of alcohol and/or other drugs in ways that affect the course of treatment of the mental disorder.


Surveys have shown that one third of dual diagnosis psychiatric patients will abuse or depend on alcohol and that one third of individuals suffering from alcohol abuse will be additionally diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder. Sixty percent of individuals who abuse drugs other than alcohol will be dually diagnosed


For individuals who experience mania, the lifetime risk for developing alcoholism is six times greater than compared to the general population while major depression carries a risk of twice the average. Individuals who are dually diagnosed may have slower rate of recovery than individuals without major substance abuse. Currently, there are few comprehensive, integrated, recovery programs for these individuals, although research is continuing. A moderate lifestyle will help control the illness.


Mood Disorders

The term mood describes a pervasive and sustained emotional state that may affect all aspects of an individual’s life and perceptions. Mood disorders are pathologically elevated or depressed disturbances of mood, and include full or partial episodes of depression or anxiety. A mood episode (for example, major depression) is a cluster of symptoms that occur together for a discrete period of time. People are more likely to seek help when moderately depressed versus when they are experiencing an episode of mania.



Everyone has feelings of sadness and disappointment. Depression’s main symptom is that of intense, pervasive, persistent feelings of sadness, hopelessness, and frustration that cause considerable impairment in social and occupational functioning. Untreated, moderate to the more severe depression can lead to suicide attempts or psychotic thinking and behavior.

Some typical symptoms of depression are: poor appetite and weight loss or marked increase in appetite and associated weight gain; sleep disturbance; loss of energy, excessive fatigue or tiredness; slow speech and movements; change in activity level; loss of interest or pleasure in usual activities; decreased sex drive; diminished ability to think or concentrate; indecisiveness; withdrawal and isolation from family; decreased memory function and lack of concentration; disorganization; highly critical of self; low self-esteem feelings of worthlessness or excessive guilt which may reach delusional proportions; recurrent thoughts of death or self harm contemplating or attempting suicide; heightened or changed perceptions


Mood Disorders Due to a Medical Condition

Mood disorder due to a general medical condition can be described as having (1) manic features, (2) depressive features, or (3) mixed features in which symptoms of both mania and depression are present and neither predominates (DSM-IV-TR, 2000).


Medical conditions that can either precipitate or mimic mood disorders include the following:

  • Malnutrition
  • Anemia
  • Hyper- and hypothyroidism
  • Dementia
  • Brain disease
  • Lupus
  • Post-cardiac condition
  • Stroke, especially among elderly people.

Medications, including medications that treat hypertension and hypotension, can cause conditions that may be confused with psychiatric or alcohol or drug (“AOD”) disorders. Both prescribed and over-the-counter (OTC) medications can precipitate depression.


Diet pills and other OTC medications can lead to mania. Patients treated with neuroleptic (antipsychotic) drugs may have a marked constriction of affect that can be misinterpreted as a symptom of depression.


The anxiety disorders are the most common group of psychiatric disorders (DSM-IV-TR, 2000). The term anxiety refers to the sensations of nervousness, tension, apprehension, and fear that emanate from the anticipation of danger, which may be internal or external. Anxiety disorders describe different clusters of signs and symptoms of anxiety, panic, and phobias.


Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) begins with an individual experiencing a psychologically traumatic stressor such as witnessing death, being threatened with death or injury, or being sexually abused. At the time of the stressor event, the individual experiences intense fear, helplessness, or horror (Retrieved 3/12/2010 from PTSD entails a persistent re-experiencing of the trauma in the form of recurrent and intrusive images and thoughts, or recurrent dreams, or experiencing episodes during which the trauma is relived (perhaps with hallucinations) (Retrieved 3/12/2010 from People with PTSD experience persistent symptoms of increased arousal such as insomnia, irritability, hypervigilance, and exaggerated startle response. They persistently avoid stimuli related to the trauma such as activities, feelings, and thoughts associated with the traumatic event (Retrieved 3/12/2010 from


Interest in the role of sexual abuse and incest in PTSD and other psychiatric and AOD disorders has increased. Clinicians note that long-term responses to childhood and adult sexual abuse often include symptoms associated with PTSD and other psychiatric problems, including an increased risk for AOD disorders (Retrieved 3/12/2010 from Many such problems are addressed in treatment efforts popular in adult children of alcoholic (ACOA) programs, some of which are controversial and unsubstantiated by research or long-term observation (Retrieved 3/12/2010 from Such treatment approaches may exacerbate AOD use and psychiatric disorders and should be cautiously undertaken. Amnesic periods have to be carefully evaluated both as blackout phenomena and as possible dissociated states (Retrieved 3/12/2010 from Such differentiation can be extremely complicated. While a clinician’s immediate response may be to identify these patients as being intoxicated, they may be experiencing independent psychiatric phenomena (Retrieved 3/12/2010 from



Prevalence rates for anxiety disorders in the general population can be estimated from the Epidemiological Catchment Area (“ECA”) studies. According to the ECA studies, anxiety disorders affect more than 7 percent of adults in the general population, the lifetime prevalence rate of anxiety disorders is 14.6 percent. Women, individuals under age 45, those who are separated or divorced, and those in low socioeconomic groups all have a higher rate of anxiety disorders than individuals in other groups.


These same ECA studies indicate that in the general population:

  • The 1-month prevalence rate for any anxiety disorder is 7.3 percent (4.7 percent for males and 9.7 percent for females), and the 6-month rate is 8.9 percent.
  • The 1-month prevalence rate for phobia is about 6.2 percent (3.8 percent for males and 8.4 percent for females).
  • The 1-month prevalence rate for panic disorder is about 0.5 percent (0.3 percent for males and 0.7 percent for females).
  • The 1-month prevalence rate for obsessive-compulsive disorder is 1.3 percent (1.1 percent for males and 1.5 percent for females).
  • Lifetime prevalence of post-traumatic stress syndrome in the general population is estimated to be less than 1 percent. The prevalence among individuals who have experienced a psychologically traumatic stressor and then developed psychiatric symptoms is poorly understood.

Among patients with AOD problems, there is a significant likelihood of a coexisting anxiety disorder. One study noted that more than 60 percent of patients being treated for AOD disorders had a lifetime diagnosis of an anxiety disorder, and about 45 percent experienced an anxiety disorder within the past month (Grant, et al., 2004). Other studies have demonstrated that most anxiety disorders among patients in addiction treatment are AOD induced (Grant, et al., 2004).

Treating Dual Diagnosis

Those who have both a mental illness and an addiction to drugs or alcohol present a challenge for medical professionals. Treating these individuals is complicated by the overlapping symptoms of the addiction and the mental illness. Complete treatment takes time and great care due to the delicate nature of the individual and due to the fact that symptoms of one condition complicate or impede the symptoms and treatment of the other.


Because these individuals have a mental illness, getting them to comply with the rules and regulations of a typical drug rehab program can be difficult. It is difficult to get them to take their meds, attend counseling or other basic necessities associated with success in a rehab program.

The most successful approaches for dual diagnosis patients are the integrated programs that treat all aspects of the illnesses in a single location. Mental health professionals and addiction rehab counselors work together in these programs to provide well-rounded care that encompasses everything involved in the diagnosis.

The dual diagnosis treatment process may include:

Intake interviews from mental health professionals to assess the psychiatric issues the patient is experiencing. This stage will help identify which mental illness the individual is experiencing.

Psychiatric/clinical diagnosis and assessment of the mental illness. Medication may be prescribed at this point, as well as general psychiatric counseling to address the illness.

Integration of addiction rehab. Using the knowledge gained from the psychological evaluation, counselors will begin working with individuals to address their drug or alcohol addiction. This process may be move at a more deliberate pace than “stand alone” rehab because of the complications caused by the mental illness.

  • Treat for the mind, body and spirit. Programs that employ holistic treatments such as massage therapy, yoga, nutritional counseling and meditation help the individual find balance in their lives (often for the first time). Not all dual diagnosis rehab programs offer holistic care, but those that do enjoy high rates of success, and low relapse rates.
  • Coping skills. Individuals are taught new methods for coping with their mental illness and shown how to avoid the triggers that can cause relapse. In this final phase of the dual diagnosis rehab, the individual learns to master the tools needed to succeed in the outside world.
  • Relapse prevention. Aftercare programs provide a support structure and accountability for the individual. The period after leaving rehab can be difficult, and indeed, scary for the recovering addict with a mental illness.
  • There is much to do (take meds regularly, avoid triggers of addiction) and even more to rebuild (personal relationship, careers, etc.) but the aftercare program lets the individual know that they are not alone during this part of their journey and provides much needed structure.

Professional and Vocational Planning

Although some patients with dual disorders have severe and poorly remitting mood and AOD disorders, most patients improve, especially with careful psychiatric treatment. Since these disorders are generally well controlled, patients can experience very high levels of vocational, social, and creative functioning. As a result, vocational planning should be long term and accentuate patient strengths.

Interview with Amy Novicoff-Fackrel

“Be true to yourself and believe in yourself,
play on your strengths and go for it.”


Amy Novicoff-Fackrell, is a former lawyer, a recovering alcoholic, bipolar and the owner and executive director of Viewpoint Dual Recovery Center in Prescott, Arizona.  She practices what she preaches.   The biggest influence in her life was her own mother, who she described as a brilliant, informed, strong woman; words that clearly apply to Amy as well.

Amy’s program treats those caught in the difficult collision of mental illness and addiction.  A difficult job by any measure.  We recently interviewed her to find out what made this talented, successful young lawyer turn to such a challenging career path.  Her answers were thoughtful and revealing.


Amy, tell us about you . . .


I grew up in an amazing family with the world at my feet.  My parents are loving, caring, and supportive people.  I went to fantastic schools, took gymnastics, piano, ballet lessons and went to camp every summer.   We travelled; my family showed me the world.

My parents sent me to college at the University of Texas in Austin, Texas, and then to law school at Northwestern University in Chicago, Illinois.  I practiced law for the next 16-17 years, for a few years in Texas, and then in California for the balance of my law career.

After my first divorce, I remember making a conscious decision to get high every day.  My rationale was that since time healed all wounds, I would drink and use until my pain was gone.   I spent the next year and a half doing exactly that, until my family stepped in and I had my first treatment experience.   I was in treatment for eight months and managed to put together four and a half years of abstinence, though not necessarily sobriety.  I went back to practicing law; my ego came back; and I picked up a drink again.

I spent the next six years trying to make it back.  I knew I was miserable; I had even resigned myself to the fact that I would be an active alcoholic and drug addict.  I didn’t know how to get out of the dark, deep hole I was in.

I had struggled with depression and ADHD over the years and was given various medications to deal with those diagnoses.  However, it wasn’t until I was finally accurately diagnosed with bipolar disorder and found a psychiatrist that helped me find the right medication that I got one more chance.  I grabbed on to it for dear life.

More importantly, I finally surrendered and started taking direction, which included being medication compliant on a daily basis.  I got a sponsor and worked the steps again and again.

I went back to school and got my Master’s degree in counseling and psychology.  I knew if I went back to practicing law, I would have a hard time having any peace and serenity in my life and would have trouble staying sober.


Looking back at where you were when you started your recovery journey, where did you think it was going to lead you?


I could not have imagined the path that I would eventually take.  I thought that I would go to treatment, get fixed.  Then I’d go back to practicing law and life would be perfect.  Talk about delusional!  It has been a bumpy road but I wouldn’t trade it for anything.  I have worked hard to get where I am and I can’t wait to see what the rest of the journey brings.


What’s the hardest thing for you about being a recovering person?


The hardest thing for me to reconcile was all of the horrible decisions I made, the accompanying horrible behaviors and, most importantly, how I hurt the people I love.  The great thing is that I don’t ever have to go back to that way of life.

Recovery is awesome and it has shown me how to have a better life.  The most difficult thing for me is getting out of my own way.


Why do you do what you do?  What motivates you?


I am just a person trying to get better and am no different than any other recovering person.   I am trying to give back because people were there for me.  I believe that recovery from a dual illness is possible.

After receiving treatment at some of the finest chemical dependency facilities in this world, there was no place for me to go to learn how to live with my co-occurring disorders.  I am bipolar and an alcoholic.  Remove the substance addiction and I was still bipolar; my life was still compromised.  Thank God, people were there for me.  I wanted to take what they taught me and help others learn how to live a healthy and productive life in spite of the issues that come with a dual diagnosis.

I decided – with a lot of guidance and support – to create a place, Viewpoint, where people battling a dual diagnosis could come to heal.  I have never looked back.  I have been able to share my experience, strength and hope with others and hopefully have been able to give back that which was given to me.


Working in the addiction field and managing a treatment program, what have been some of the expected and unexpected hurdles?


It is frustrating to see someone who is not ready and still maintain good boundaries in the therapeutic relationship.  It’s hard because I want my clients to succeed and receive all of the benefits and gifts of recovery.

Funding is a critical issue in dual diagnosis treatment.  Funding for long-term mental health programs has been severely cut over the past 20 years.  This type of treatment is expensive.  Insurance coverage, usually costly, typically only partially covers mental health and addiction treatment.  Most people cannot afford the treatment they need.


What has been hard for you?


Seeing all of the death and destruction, knowing there is a better way.   All I can do is be of service to others and not play God.  There is nothing easy about this job, but I have walked in my clients’ shoes and have a deep understanding of their illnesses, and what they are going through.


Do you have advice to offer people who are aspiring to do what you do?


Be true to yourself and believe in yourself, play on your strengths and go for it.  Surround yourself with good people and ask for their help.   Remember that you are perfectly imperfect and that mistakes are okay, that’s how we learn.

Life is full of difficulties and problems.  It’s how you handle those experiences that make the difference between lemons and lemonade.

The Forest AND the Trees

…what comes to us alone may be garbled by our own rationalization and wishful thinking. The benefit of talking to another person is that we can get his direct comment and counsel on our situation…

—Twelve and Twelve p.60

The Viewpoint Edge

What makes Viewpoint Dual Recovery Center different from other Treatment Centers?

The goal of dual diagnosis interventions is to manage both illnesses so that the client can pursue meaningful life goals. Viewpoint Dual Recovery Center simultaneously addresses chemical dependency, substance abuse, and the “associated” conditions or illnesses.

Although treatment centers and programs traditionally have focused on drug addiction within the framework of 12-Step philosophies and treated the associated conditions that perpetuate addiction as secondary, Viewpoint Dual Recovery Center addresses chemical dependency, substance use, and the “associated conditions” equally and simultaneously. The goal of dual diagnosis interventions is recovery from two or more serious illnesses. At Viewpoint Dual Recovery Center, “recovery” means that the individual with a dual diagnosis learns to manage both illnesses so that he or she can pursue meaningful life goals.

Viewpoint Dual Recovery Center’s holistic, comprehensive treatment program acknowledges that addiction and co-occurring disorders require attention to the mind, body, and soul. We provide our patients with the latest evidence-based, client-focused treatment for addiction and mental disorders.

Viewpoint is a unique alternative addiction treatment program. We are an Intensive Outpatient Program coupled with a structured Sober Transitional Living environment, designed to help men and women reintegrate back into life through recovery living. We customize our approach with the client to create a progressively responsible plan integrating recovery behaviors, skills, and lifestyle changes to address addiction and co-occurring illnesses.